|
CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION
& DISPUTE RESOLUTION MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC HORAIRE POUR LE DÉCEMBRE 2009 L’arbitre M.G. Picher que préside / Arbitrator M. G. Picher presiding |
||
|
Updated 23 December 2009 |
Mis à jour le 23 décembre 2009 |
|
|
[xxx] |
TUESDAY, 08 DECEMBER 2009 / MARDI, LE 8 DÉCEMBRE 2009 |
|
|
Litige ex
parte entre VIA Rail et TCA concernant le modification de
l’assignation de M. Michel Chiasson suite à une assignation temporaire. Le litige sera limité aux objections
préliminaires de la Corporation. |
||
|
Litige ex parte entre VIA Rail et TCA concernant le modification de l’assignation de M. B. Woods suite à une assignation temporaire. Le litige sera limité aux objections préliminaires de la Corporation. |
||
|
Litige ex parte entre VIA Rail et TCA concernant le reclassement du poste de vérification des stocks (entrepôt). Le litige sera limité aux objections préliminaires de la Corporation. |
||
|
Dispute between CNR
and TCRC concerning the discipline
assessed Locomotive Engineer J. Chevalier for his alleged unacceptable
conduct which resulted in his discharge for the accumulation of demerits.
[COUNSEL] |
||
|
Dispute between CNR
and TCRC concerning discharge of
Locomotive Engineer B. Gibson for his alleged violation of CROR rule 439.
[COUNSEL] |
||
|
WEDNESDAY, 09 DECEMBER 2009 / MERCREDI, LE 9 DÉCEMBRE 2009 |
||
|
Litige
entre CANPAR et MÉTALLOS (1976) concernant le
congédiement d’un employé. |
||
|
Dispute between CPR
and TCRC/MWED concerning claim on
behalf of |
||
|
IEHP |
Various disputes between CPR and TCRC/MWED to
be dealt with using the IEHP process. |
|
|
THURSDAY, 10 DECEMBER 2009 / JEUDI, LE 10 DÉCEMBRE 2009 |
||
|
Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC concerning the suspension assessed Locomotive Engineer B. Chychul. [COUNSEL] |
||
|
Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC
concerning the 15 demerits assessed Locomotive Engineer L. Grzesiak following
his alleged failure to comply with proper radio procedures, |
||
|
Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC
concerning the 40 demerits assessed Locomotive Engineer L. Grzesiak following
his tour of duty |
||
|
Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC concerning the discipline assessed Locomotive Engineer S. VanDerMark for his alleged violation of CROR rules and the Company’s drug & alcohol policy. [COUNSEL] |
||
|
Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC concerning the discipline assessed Conductor J. Turnbull for his alleged violation of CROR 104 which resulted in his discharge for the accumulation of demerits. [COUNSEL] |
||
|
CROA&DR 3824: Ex parte dispute between CNR and TCRC concerning the discipline assessed K. Gelowitz which resulted in his discharge for the accumulation of demerits. Hearing subject to Arbitrator’s award concerning the Company’s preliminary objection. [COUNSEL] |
||
|
Supplementary award in CROA&DR 3753. |
||
|
13 CASES SCHEDULE 9 CASES FILED EX PARTE – 8 CASES WITH
COUNSEL |
||
|
Updated 23 December 2009 |
Mis à jour le 23 décembre 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|