CANADIAN RAILWAY OFFICE OF ARBITRATION & DISPUTE RESOLUTION
BUREAU D'ARBITRAGE ET DE MÉDIATION DES CHEMINS DE FER DU CANADA

SCHEDULE: JULY 2005

Back
Retour

 Updated July 21, 2005
mis à jour le 21 juillet 2005

 
TUESDAY, 12 JULY 2005 / MARDI, LE 12 JUILLET 2005

IEHP 38 Dispute between CANPAR and USWA, Local 1976 concerning a claim on behalf of D. Chow for bereavement leave, which involved in a loss of wages and demerits assessed for an alleged unauthorized absence. [Handled by the IEHP process - award not published.]
 
CROA&DR 3497 Dispute between CANPAR and USWA, Local 1976 concerning the discipline assessed C. Primeau for his alleged insubordination.
 
CROA&DR 3498 Dispute between CANPAR and USWA, Local 1976 concerning the discipline the discipline assessed D. McMaster for the alleged abuse of his supervisor.
 
CROA&DR 3499 Dispute between CPR and TCRC concerning a claim on behalf of Locomotive Engineer R. Longworth concerning the Company's allegedly improper handling of his nedical condition.
 
CROA&DR 3500 Dispute between CPR and TCRC concerning claim on behalf of Conductor G. Brandt that his discharge was improper given the mitigating circumstances surrounding his medical condition and personal issues.
 

 
WEDNESDAY, 13 JULY 2005 / MERCREDI, LE 13 JUILLET 2005

CROA&DR 3501 Dispute between CPR and TCRC concerning claim on behalf of Conductor B. Martin for payment for required medical examinations which the Company does not consider "periodic medical examinations"
 
CROA&DR 3502 Dispute between CNR and UTU concerning the abolishment of a Regina yard assignment and the subsequent establishment of a road switcher assignment.
 
CROA&DR 3503 Dispute between CNR and UTU concerning claim on behalf of Conductor D.I. Werboweski that the Company improperly held him off duty because of his medical condition, failing in both its duty of accommodation and its duty to expedite his return to full duty.
 

 
THURSDAY, 14 JUNE 2005/ JEUDI, LE 14 JUILLET 2005

CROA&DR 3504 Dispute between CNR and CAW concerning the Union's claim that the Company has improperly assigned bargaining unit work at Clover Bar Yard to employees who are member of another bargaining unit; i.e., the United Transportation Union, which has been given intervener status in this matter.
 
CROA&DR 3505 Dispute between CPR and TCRC/MWED concerning a claim on behalf of D. Baker that the Company has failed in its duty of accommodation and to expedite his return to work.
 

9 CASES / 9 GRIEFS

Back
Retour		 Updated July 21, 2005
mis à jour le 21 juillet 2005